defeat-reversal-propagates-automatically

IN derived (depth 3)

All outlist-based defeat mechanisms (challenge, kill-switch, supersession) not only reverse in principle but propagate recovery automatically through safe terminating BFS — when a defeating node is retracted, the outlist entry becomes satisfied, and propagation cascades truth-value restoration to all affected nodes without manual re-assertion

Summary

When any node that was suppressing another belief gets retracted, the system does not just allow recovery in theory — it actively restores truth values to every downstream node affected by that suppression, using a breadth-first sweep that is guaranteed to finish without loops or crashes. This means defeat is never a permanent side effect; removing the cause automatically and completely undoes the consequence chain.

Justifications

SL — Defeat reversibility (outlist semantics flip truth without destroying structure) plus safe propagation (BFS with guaranteed termination) should yield automatic recovery — but only if outlist nodes are tracked in the dependents index so that retracting a defeating node triggers propagation to the defeated nodes

Antecedents (all must be IN):

  • all-defeat-mechanisms-are-reversible — Every outlist-based defeat operation (challenge, kill-switch, supersession) is inherently reversible because outlist semantics flip truth values without deleting nodes
  • propagation-is-safe-and-terminating — Truth propagation is both lifecycle-safe and guaranteed to terminate: retracted nodes are skipped, trigger nodes are never recomputed, BFS prevents stack overflow, and stop-on-unchanged prevents oscillation — propagation respects every node state it encounters.

Unless (any of these IN defeats this justification):

  • outlist-nodes-not-in-dependents-index — Outlist nodes are not tracked in the `dependents` index, so when an outlist node is retracted (goes OUT), dependent GATE beliefs are not enqueued for re-evaluation by `_propagate` — requiring manual `reasons assert` as a workaround.

Dependents

These beliefs depend on this one:

Details