cp-and-sl-evaluated-identically
IN premise
CP and SL justifications use the same validity check in `_justification_valid`; the distinction is semantic (support vs. consistency), not computational.
Summary
The system treats conditional-proof justifications and support-list justifications exactly the same way when deciding whether they hold — both just check that their antecedent beliefs are currently in. The difference between "this is supported by these reasons" and "this is consistent given these assumptions" is a label for human understanding, not something the engine acts on differently during propagation.
Dependents
These beliefs depend on this one:
- justification-evaluation-is-uniform-and-pure — All justification types (SL and CP) use the same validity rule (antecedents IN, outlist OUT), evaluated as a pure function with no side effects
Details
| Source | entries/2026/04/23/topic-doyle-1979-tms.md |