corrections-span-all-origins-with-full-auditability
OUT derived (depth 7)
Every correction mechanism — intentional dialectical challenge/defend and automated contradiction resolution — is both reliable and fully auditable with traceable history, and this complete correction coverage spans all belief origins (human, LLM, agent) — no belief from any provenance can undergo an untraced or unreliable correction.
Summary
When something gets corrected in the system — whether through deliberate challenge or automatic contradiction detection — that correction is reliable, fully traceable, and works identically no matter who or what originally introduced the claim. Currently this property does not hold, meaning there may be gaps where a correction could happen without a complete audit trail or where beliefs from certain sources might not be subject to the same correction process as others.
Justifications
SL — Correction reliability/auditability combined with origin-spanning dispute resolution ensures universal traceable correction regardless of provenance
Antecedents (all must be IN):
- all-corrections-are-reliable-and-auditable — Every belief correction — whether intentional (dialectical challenge/defend) or automated (contradiction-triggered backtracking, staleness-driven revision) — is both reliable (reaching correct truth state through complete mechanisms) and auditable (maintaining full traceable history of nogoods and resolutions).
- dispute-resolution-spans-all-origins — Both dispute resolution mechanisms (intentional dialectical and automated contradiction) are complete and reliable, and all belief origins participate in the same deterministic revision pipeline — every belief from any source can be disputed and resolved through identical mechanisms.
Dependents
These beliefs depend on this one:
- external-beliefs-are-correctable-and-invariant-equivalent — External beliefs achieve full parity along two independent quality axes: invariant equivalence ensures they participate in the same consistency guarantees as internal beliefs, while origin-spanning auditability ensures they are fully correctable with complete traceable history.
- revision-is-evaluation-invariant-and-auditable-across-origins — The belief revision system achieves two independent trustworthiness properties universally: evaluation invariance (revision governs richer state than binary truth yet produces identical evaluation results regardless of mutation path) and full auditability across all origins (every correction — dialectical or automated — is reliable and auditable regardless of whether the belief was human-initiated, LLM-derived, or agent-imported).
- revision-system-is-reliable-and-auditable — The revision system achieves two independent trustworthiness properties simultaneously: end-to-end reliability across logical and infrastructure layers with no blind spots, and complete auditability with traceable correction history spanning all belief origins.
- self-maintenance-is-fully-auditable — The fully characterized self-maintaining loop provides complete operational auditability: every self-correction, maintenance action, and belief revision leaves traceable history across all belief origins and correction types — conditional on propagation soundness guaranteeing that cascade effects are faithfully recorded.